State Bad credit debt consolidation loan Payday advance loan Debt consolidation loan Dog Attorney Buy tramadol Buy cialis online viagra Refinance Biaxin Credit cards Pediatricians Hot Personal trainer Phentermine online Diet pills Buying viagra online Get phentermine Youtube Best payday loan Orbitz High roller casino Order paxil Pharmaceutical companies Payday cash loan Sex videos Buy car insurance Legal assistant Discount soma Online gambling site Zyrtec Paxil online Buying viagra Best cialis price Purchase viagra Order soma online Klonopin Protonix Forex currency trading Buy xanax Free credit report Coupons Viagra gel Buy discount tramadol Buy paxil online Sarasota Debt relief Sex cam Online education Xxx Ritalin Trade House Education online Mcafee Direct tv Cheap viagra Pictures Football contest Hotel 


More draft speculatin’

For some unknown reason – and I think it has something to do with the half-assed coverage our beloved team normally receives – I have this irrational infatuation with how outsiders look at us. As one example, let’s look at the latest team needs via yahoo on rivals.com.

Running back? Sure. Cornerback? Well, like duh. Defensive end? Ummmm…..

I dunno. There is something a bit odd about Rivals listing DE as a Texans team need. And, see, here’s that weird little thing about Rivals that the Comicle can’t rival: Rivals actually takes pride in their reporting. So, if the Rivals sez it’s true, it must be, right? Well, in that self-gratification kinda way, they nailed that sucker!

Look, let’s be honest here. Will Smithiakibbs take a RB in the first? Extremely doubtful. I simply don’t see the team taking a RB with #18 with the new system in place and a whole host of RBs coming out this year. LT? Yeah, I don’t think so. I mean, if you took George Foster, would you take another T in the first so soon? Talk about jilted dude syndrome. CB? That’s a maybe. I still think that the team look at CBs via FA, and the CB talent this year in the draft – while not horrible – it won’t be elite by our pick. Talib? Maybe. I just don’t think so.

I’ve said for a while, no matter how irrationally, that we take a DE with our pick. I’m going to wait until after the combine as to who I think that might be, but, personally, I think that’s where we are going. However, I jumped on the Shake train a long time ago hoping that we will trade down to acquire a late first and late second. If that’s the case, all the better. Still, I think our first pick will be a DE.

If I am wrong, I will dance for your entertainment.

10 Responses to “More draft speculatin’”

  1. Shake
    (click arrow to reply)Reply to this comment

    The train ride is the only way to get where we really need to be in April.


  2. kozanack
    (click arrow to reply)Reply to this comment

    I can see DE in round 1. You definitely can make the case that rushing the passer is a primary need. They have publicly stated that LT and CB are needs. But they may feel like they can find the right guy in the mid rounds. But there’s no telling. The Texans have definitely defied the common wisdom (fans, draft gurus, ESPN) the past couple of years, and definitely had success.


  3. grungedave
    (click arrow to reply)Reply to this comment

    There are a few CBs that have Round 1 grades, but they may not slide to Houston. We’ll have our pick of any non-McFadden RB it seems, but we won’t spend so much on one.

    trading down is the most likely option if we can find a partner.

    this could be like last year when we just pick the best player available. It’s not like we are super-deep at any position. Unless that position is “defensive backs who can’t cover.”


  4. 1Texan
    (click arrow to reply)Reply to this comment

    You’d be a little more careful on your pick if this guy was to decide the outcome of your call:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hSu8M4oxd88&feature=related

    He wants a LT.


  5. bigfatdrunk
    (click arrow to reply)Reply to this comment

    1tex: I would so kick his sorry ass.


  6. Lee-UofTOrange
    (click arrow to reply)Reply to this comment

    I’ve said it many times before, but if Jonathan Stewart is there and we don’t draft him, I’ll probably cry.

    I think we’ve doneenough with our line the last few years, let’s either help the offense or get someone in the secondary. Obviously getting a later one and a 2 would be great, I’d even take 2 number 2s for our 1 if that was possible and Stewart wasn’t there.


  7. stacy
    (click arrow to reply)Reply to this comment

    @1tex: I’d punch him in the neck.
    -
    @bfd: Unless we trade down, I have to agree with your assessment, I’m betting we’ll take a DE.


  8. grungedave
    (click arrow to reply)Reply to this comment

    Hey, Lee, remember when Derrick Johnson was on the board and we did not pick him? Yeah, you’re gonna have that feeling again with Stewart.

    Hell, we may even trade down again!


  9. bigfatdrunk
    (click arrow to reply)Reply to this comment

    When we passed on Johnson, I gave up hope for the previous regime. It was pretty obvious we were screwed with that management team.


  10. beef
    (click arrow to reply)Reply to this comment

    I know it’s unlikely that he falls to us at 18, but after reading the measurements of Calais Campbell from Miami, I’m all for drafting another DE. Just imagining a 6′8 behemoth on each end of the line made me pee out a few drips, ESPECIALLY one from the U, who has prolly already murdered 3 or 4 VY lookalikes this month.
    I just did it again…. I need a napkin.